January 28, 2005

Notorious

There are ways to get big and get noticed and self-promote. I know how to do it, seen it happen. It takes a lot of time. Here's a quick how-to:

You build up a reputation through commenting effectively on the top 10-20 blogs (which is the most time-consuming part, pumping your signal above an incredible amount of noise), then you email lots of 2nd and 3rd tier bloggers (I'm currently way down on the food chain, probably 5th or 6th tier according to the ecosystem) and ask for cross-links. You have to be savvy enough to make good, original comments that will get noticed, of course.

Next, you send your best posts around a couple times a week (better, put them into comment sections of larger blogs where they fit) and try to get quoted without being too annoying, then repeat with the first-tier bloggers and hope you have enough name recognition that they don't delete your email out of hand, etc. That's the part that I don't know is possible at this point unless you have a personal connection somehow or incredibly lucky timing. Once you get your traffic high enough to be noticed by memeorandum, Cursor, the Daou Report or something similar, you've got it made (but it is still a ton of work to stay among the top).

Not sure if I could get into the top 100 blogs at this point if I wanted to, but if I had started a blog for that purpose two years ago, I could have. If I started doing all that stuff, I would have to take this blog seriously and the rest of my life a lot less seriously. Once the blog isn't for me, it would stop being a fun hobby and start being a chore.

I made the same choice with on-line gaming (Clan Lord). When I didn't have a life, it was easy to gain notoriety and ranks. Once Michelle and I got together, I still don't know how we managed to play so much while everything else was going on, but I guess we eventually succumbed to reality and picked real life over CL. I wouldn't go back down that path with gaming or my blog. Real life is way too much fun (and busy) now, a fact that makes me happy every day.

Plus, I already get to influence plenty of impressionable minds in real life, so I don't need to compensate by completely externalizing the purpose of this blog for all of you closed-minded Covenant-hating freaks. :)

Posted by Observer at January 28, 2005 07:06 AM
Comments

Comments on entries can only be made in pop-up windows while those entries are still on the main index page. Sorry for the inconvenience this causes, but this blocks about 99.99% of the spam the blog receives.

Heh, I still need to try and pick up that series. It sound like one I might enjoy, although my hubby has cautioned me against it... But then again, I love the works of William Faulkner, so I might just be a weirdo to start with... :)

Posted by: Liz on January 28, 2005 08:08 AM

Actually, the first series is worth trying to read ... once. I wouldn't deny that the writing style is good. It's just that I find the theme and the characters unrelentingly depressing (the only character worth the time of day is Mhoram), and there's been no sign that the second series is any different, so I've never picked it up, and I cannot understand why people enjoy it.

Posted by: Feff on January 28, 2005 09:45 AM

Compared the the first series, the second series is like a 3-month long root canal.

Now that leprosy can be cured it loses some of it's effect, as well.

I thought the purpose of this blog was for you to rant about politics?

Posted by: Humbaba on January 28, 2005 10:22 AM

The purpose of this blog is for me to talk about whatever I feel like talking about, and sometimes that means venting about whatever pisses me off. If I'm not particularly pissed off about politics at any given moment, though, I might throw a book review out there just to see what other people think. Or talk about home life, work, whatever.

The point I was trying to make is that I never want to put myself in a position where I feel like I have to talk about some current events even though I don't necessarily have anything original or interesting to say. I want to talk about what I want to talk about for my own reasons. The blog is meant to be a therapeutic hobby, not an avenue for making money or gaining fame, etc. It's nice to be noticed, of course.

Posted by: Observer on January 28, 2005 10:52 AM

Actually, I do appreciate Observer's blog, because I don't have to enter an email address to be able to post a comment. (He knows who I am and where I live, of course.)

Why do other blogs require that? It's all write-only memory, and if I want to put in a dead address I can usually get away with it, so why bother?

Posted by: Feff on January 28, 2005 10:56 AM

There are only two reasons, really, to require an email address: One is to discourage stupid trolls. Some trolls (including kids who are screwing around on the internet during their library time in junior high) are not smart enough to realize you can put a fake email address in there, and so that prevents them from electronically vandalizing your site. Second is to discourage spam. A lot of spambots do not automatically put an email in with their comment, and so by requiring it, you can cut down x% of spam in a heartbeat. I don't know what x is, though.

Posted by: Observer on January 28, 2005 11:55 AM

Hmm, ok. The reason I prefer not to leave an email is because nost so much that I don't trust places not to sell the harvested emails to spammers, but because it's too damn easy for an archive to hacked and all email addresses in there harvested and sold to spammers.

I know that one of those two (I hope the latter, but you never can be sure) happens with the e-greeting card outfits; give one of them an email address and that address soon starts getting spam of the worst kind.

Posted by: Feff on January 28, 2005 01:04 PM

There's a third reason, actually. With MT's emailing comments by email address, if none is set it sets your own as the sender. If you force people to put anything in there, fake or no, you can at least have some idea of the who the author is before you even look at it.

Oh, and I like Faulkner. He's good.

Posted by: Polerand on January 28, 2005 03:05 PM

I wonder if, in centuries to come, blogs and bloggers in the early 21st Century US will be looked at like the salons of Paris, and those who participated in them, in the last decade or two before the French Revolution.

Posted by: Feff on January 28, 2005 04:03 PM