From the Christian Science Monitor:
Liberal critics had hinted that US President George Bush would try to use it as his "September surprise"; a report by the Iraq Survey Group which would prove that Saddam Hussein really did have weapons of mass destruction. But now the Sunday Times of London, and other publications, say that the report has been delayed "indefinitely" because the group was unable to get any evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Somebody remind me again why it was so important to invade? Apparently, what little pro-WMD intelligence there was should've been treated much more skeptically given the stakes. And of course, there remains no tie between Iraq and Al Qaeda. And we had to ditch many allies for this, sacrificing a tremendous amount of post-9/11 goodwill.
Careful, don't step in the leadership.
Posted by Observer at September 16, 2003 02:17 PMComments on entries can only be made in pop-up windows while those entries are still on the main index page. Sorry for the inconvenience this causes, but this blocks about 99.99% of the spam the blog receives.