August 12, 2003

Time to Stand

William Rivers Pitt, author of a couple of books about post-9/11 America, recently gave a speech to a group of Veterans in San Francisco. It was on par with Al Gore's recent comments, though I think the passion was a couple notches higher. Makes for very good reading if you have about 5-10 minutes:

If the American people fully knew what this war in Iraq was really about, if they fully knew what it means today to be a soldier in that part of the world, they would tear the White House apart brick by brick. If the people had but a taste of the horror and the lies, they would repudiate this administration and all it stands for. They don't know, because they have been fed a glutton's diet of misinformation and fraud. ...

They call it Pax Americana, a plan to invade Iraq, take it over, create a permanent military presence there, and use the oil revenues to fund further wars against virtually every nation in that region. This we call bringing our "values" over there. Norman Podhoretz, one of the ideological fathers of this group of neoconservatives who now control the foreign policy of this nation, described the process as "the reformation and modernization of Islam." That's a pretty fancy phrase. I am a Catholic, and can therefore call it by its simpler name: Crusade. We know all about those.

This is the Project for a New American Century, the product of a right-wing think tank that, in 1997, was considered so far out there that no one ever thought its members would ever come within ten miles of setting American policy. One broken election, however, vaulted these men into positions of unspeakable power. Their white papers, their dreams of empire at the point of the sword, have become our national nightmare and the nightmare of the world. I speak of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Lewis Libby and the rest of these New American Century men who have taken our beloved country and all it stands for it and thrown it down into the mud.

You will note that I did not name George W. Bush, for blaming Bush for the gross misadministration of this government is like blaming Mickey Mouse when Disney screws up. He is not in charge. Truman said "The buck stops here," and so we point to Bush as a symbol of all that has gone wrong. But he is not in charge. These other men, these New American Century men, have delivered us to this wretched estate, and by God in Heaven, there will be a reckoning for it. ...

Pax Americana. That which President Kennedy spoke so eloquently and specifically against when he said, "What kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced upon the world by our weapons of war." This is now the rule of law for this nation. It must be stopped, and we must be the ones to stop it. ...

They can take nothing from us that we are not willing to give, and we are not willing to give this great nation up. Let them be warned. We stand our ground.

And our numbers are growing.

Posted by Observer at August 12, 2003 09:20 AM
Comments

Comments on entries can only be made in pop-up windows while those entries are still on the main index page. Sorry for the inconvenience this causes, but this blocks about 99.99% of the spam the blog receives.

Hahhah. This dude still has issues from Vietnam he hasn't worked out yet.

Posted by: Humbaba on August 12, 2003 09:36 AM

Hmm. Since it is usually from people I characterize as right-wing nitwits that whacko conspiracy theories come, I suppose it is plausible that right-wing nitwits really do think they can operate like one of their twisted conspiracy theories. I'll have to think about that one. I place great value in the adage "Do not attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity"; thinking about self-organizing systems (of things we know to be mindless, like sand grains and so on) and then applying it to large masses of unthinking people (which is disturbingly appropriate) can get you a lot of insight.

The most complex behavior comes from semi-mindless systems, and I guess that's what we have.

Conspiracy theories inevitably require omniscience on the part of the entities running the show. But that omniscience is impossible. So now you have to decide what would happen with a group of people who believed themselves to be omniscient and applied great powers on their misapprehension....

Sounds like African dictators.

Posted by: Feff on August 12, 2003 01:00 PM

Actually, the speaker didn't fight in Vietnam, but his father did. 30 years from now, how many people are going to be fighting through Iraq issues because of the incredible stupidity and recklessness of Bushco?

Posted by: Observer on August 12, 2003 01:32 PM