July 22, 2003

Foresight is 20/20

Before the war, like many other people, I openly wondered whether the Iraq war would truly make Americans safer. I guess I must be some flaming Commie liberal for daring to question what was about the happen, but I'm in good company. Turns out the bulk of the intelligence community (as summarized in the recently de-classified and released National Intelligence Estimate about the war) agreed with me:

"Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists," President Bush said in Cincinnati on Oct. 7. "Alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints."

But declassified portions of a still-secret National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) released Friday by the White House show that at the time of the president's speech the U.S. intelligence community judged that possibility to be unlikely. In fact, the NIE, which began circulating Oct. 2, shows the intelligence services were much more worried that Hussein might give weapons to al Qaeda terrorists if he were facing death or capture and his government was collapsing after a military attack by the United States.

"Saddam, if sufficiently desperate, might decide that only an organization such as al Qaeda, . . . already engaged in a life-or-death struggle against the United States, could perpetrate the type of terrorist attack that he would hope to conduct," one key judgment of the estimate said.

It went on to say that Hussein might decide to take the "extreme step" of assisting al Qaeda in a terrorist attack against the United States if it "would be his last chance to exact vengeance by taking a large number of victims with him." ...

One of the judgments was that Hussein "appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or [chemical or biological weapons] against the United States fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case for making war."

Another judgment was that Iraq would "probably" attempt a clandestine attack against the United States, as mentioned by Bush -- not on "any given day" as the president said Oct. 7, but only "if Baghdad feared an attack that threatened the survival of the regime were imminent or unavoidable."

Today the situation is changed. Hussein is alive but in hiding, and his alleged stocks of chemical or biological weapons or agents have not been found. Meanwhile, the president and other leaders have yet to mention publicly the intelligence assessment that Hussein may be a potentially bigger threat now than before the United States attacked.

In fact, Bush, in his May 1 speech from the deck of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, appeared to take just the opposite position. "We have removed an ally of al Qaeda," Bush said. "No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime."

Has there been a more foolish and destructive administration in the history of the United States? I mean, yeah, I know there were some bad times during the early 19th century and during reconstruction and of course prior to the depression, but seriously, how can it get any worse? Foreign policy, domestic policy, the environment, everything across the board. What a disaster for our country. And thanks to Moron-Americans everywhere, he's got a decent chance to get re-elected.

Posted by Observer at July 22, 2003 10:20 AM
Comments

Comments on entries can only be made in pop-up windows while those entries are still on the main index page. Sorry for the inconvenience this causes, but this blocks about 99.99% of the spam the blog receives.

Ah, but even back during Reconstruction there were sane folks trying to keep the government somewhat honest so they couldn't completely mess it up.

I tend to think government works better when the congress and the president are controlled by different parties. There tends to be real compromise and not much damage is generally done.

Posted by: Bav on July 22, 2003 01:14 PM

Elected, Observer. Shame on you!

Posted by: Shamhat on July 23, 2003 05:13 AM

Slip of the tongue. Sorry.

Posted by: Observer on July 24, 2003 08:59 AM